Nutzerkonto

Wolfgang Brassat: Die Tapisserie
Die Tapisserie
(S. 121 – 146)

Wolfgang Brassat

Die Tapisserie
Ein auratischer reproduzierender Bildträger

PDF, 26 Seiten

  • Index
  • Multiples
  • Kopie
  • Serialität
  • Autorschaft
  • Kulturtechniken

Meine Sprache
Deutsch

Aktuell ausgewählte Inhalte
Deutsch

Wolfgang Brassat

hat seit 2006 den Lehrstuhl für Kunstgeschichte, insbesondere neuere und neueste Kunstgeschichte, der Otto-Friedrich Universität Bamberg inne. 1990 erlangte er die Promotion mit der Dissertation Tapisserien und Politik. Funktionen, Kontexte und Rezeption eines repräsentativen Mediums; 1998 folgte die Habilitierung mit der Habilitationsschrift Von Raffael bis Le Brun. Studien zur Historienmalerei im Zeitalter der Eloquenz sowie Vertretungsprofessuren in Bonn, Frankfurt/M., Tübingen, Erlangen, Bochum und Bamberg.

Walter Cupperi (Hg.): Multiples in Pre-Modern Art

Walter Cupperi (Hg.)

Multiples in Pre-Modern Art

Gebunden, 304 Seiten

PDF, 304 Seiten

In the last years replicated objects have gained an increasingly central position in the discourse about ancient, medieval and early modern art. ›Multiples‹, we are often told, lack uniqueness, invention, autonomy, and sometimes even authorship. Indeed, ›multiples‹ can be powerful multipliers – in that they enhance the ›aura of the originals‹ that they replicate – but they remain secondary indexes pointing to an ›original‹ imbued with significance. Yet, what happens if ›multiples‹ do not refer to other artifacts at all, or if they are associated with other ›multiples‹ rather than with a first version in the mind of their owners? What happened when serially-made ›multiples‹ were not quite identical to each other, as was the rule with pre-modern artifacts? What shaped their identity and the perception of them as identical?
This collection of essays explores different forms of interaction between the making of artifacts in more than one specimen and their reception before the nineteenth century. It addresses media such as metal, wax, plaster, terracotta, textiles, marble, ivory, porcelain, canvases and tables in an attempt to re-assess the current identification of the mediality of prints with that of pre-modern ›multiples‹ in general.